Paul Cezanne - Impressionist of Life Research Paper

Paul Cezanne - Impressionist of Life - Research Paper Example The paper "Paul Cezanne - Impressionist of Life" discovers the Impressionism and the art of Paul Cezanne. The great painters like Picasso, Henri Matisse, Braque, and many others too acknowledged him as the Father of Modern art. This essay traces the contribution of Paul Cezanne to the Modern Art. CÃ ©zanne’s paintings had many central ideas. Although he is associated with the Impressionists, yet he did not belong with them. He almost as if took the best of both the worlds and incorporated the fleeting moments which the Impressionists tried to capture and gave then character, shape and form. While experimenting with shape and form Cezanne began thinking in his later life of objects as perfect , simple geometrical shapes like as in the tree trunk as a cylinder. This simplicity and this return to the basic shaped and paved the way for Cubism. In the beginning of his life, Cezanne’s art was a bit darker in palette but after getting to work with the impressionist his color palette lightened. His works also formed inspiration for the beginning of the Fauvism movement in art. Fauvism centers on the playful attitude of the artist where he incorporates the use of bold colors into his works. The founder was Fauvism was Henri Matisse who too was inspired by the use of Cezanne’s bold colors in his works. When Cezanne encountered the Impressionists who were interested in capturing the fleeting moments of life, he was impressed by them. However, he did not like their idea of not exactly stressing on the form and only playing.

Perceptual Deficits and the Inability To Receive Sensory Information Essay

Perceptual Deficits and the Inability To Receive Sensory Information - Essay Example Besides enabling inter-hemispheric interaction, the corpus callosum has also been demonstrated to be essential in the process of attention1. From the hemispheres, the lateral geniculate bodies relay sensory signals to the occipital lobes, which is the primary visual cortex. Here, an initial analysis of the image is done and the composed image of the retinal signal is sent to higher centers of processing for further interpretation (Glickstein p.118-127). Although, perception can also be achieved by olfaction, audition as well as visual, each of this sensory information follows different modalities. Visual perception can be object of space, face (with the involvement of internal factors), or top-down perceptional operations in identifying objects in varying perspectives (Cabeza, 1997). Each of these tends to activate different sub sections of the brain functions. For instance, Cabeza (1997), explained that object occipito-parietal pathways, while top-down perceptual processing (i.e. when objects are in varying and unusual views) involves frontal, parietal and anterior cingulated regions. Furthermore, object processing is said to be left lateralized, while face processing tend to be right lateralized or bilateral (Cabeza, 1997a). Cabeza (1997b), argue that perception and at times, identification also depend, to a large extent, on the retrieval of information relevant in the particular perception. Bruner (1970), believes that memory and perception cannot be separated. Along this line, Begley et al (1986) explained that the brain could store huge amount of information with different areas storing facts, such as names, images and events, necessary for perception and identification (p.48-54). In this regard, Cabeza (1997b) said the prefrontal lobe play a crucial role in retrieving stored information, while the right inferior parietal cortex is involved in recognition and recall. The cerebellum, traditionally believed to play just motor cortex functions has been demonstrated to be involved in cognition (intelligence, processing speed, cognitive learning skills, visual spatial processing, recall etc) and perceptual functions (1997b). Such is the complexity of the human brain functioning involved with processing sensory information, perception and identification. Some of the most compelling evidences for the functional neuroanatomical divisions of the brain functions involved with perception and processing sensory signals have been provided by patients with specific cognitive impairments following localized brain injury (Aguirre and Mark, 1999). Over the last century several dozens of patients have been reported to exhibit inability to carry out one cognitive function or the other. Such impairments have varied widely depending enormously on the part of the brain concerned and the function carried out by that part of the brain. This has engaged the minds of several researchers,